Post Clicker Malaise
…or at least minor depression.
Last year, one of out tech support teachers had a set of clickers for free won at a door prize. I’ve always imagined the hilarity that must ensue at a tech lottery: milling crowds of blinking tech people salivating over laser pointers and webcams. 90/10 M/f ratios. Acronyms flying out into the ether. Backchannel twitters filling the air…A glorious technohaven/glimpse into the future.
Teaching with clickers is an enterprise fraught with doubt, even though I had what might be reasonably termed success with them. My AP Rhetoric class could go through multiple choice test questions and I could get a good, quick evaluation on which types of questions were difficult for them (i.e. anything about tone or those maniacal questions involving roman numerals). My regular 10s took quizzes and the clicker software automatically recorded their answers and printed out their score. Almost as good as ScanTron. But I thought the most useful way of using Clickers was in guided discussions about values and attitudes.
You can put up a statement like:
I think most of what I learn in school will have little impact on my life.
and ask students to rate the statement according to how much they agree or disagree with the statement. 1-being agree totally and completely 3-being neutral, meh while 5-being disagree totally and completely. Clickers have a magic effect on participation; no one lackadaisically clicks a clicker. It’s always done with spastic abandon. In a discussion like this, a quick 10 minute (or on the fly–shh!–don’t tell anyone) prep will get you a good 30-40 minute discussion on the questions. First, you have the asking of the question, then the vote, then the Reveal! look at that pretty graph. Finally, individual students talk about why they completely agreed with the idea that school will have little impact. It’s a great way to start a unit or even conduct a midway point snapshot of where students’ feelings are. It would be interesting to do a pre and post value check and see if the experience of reading, say, The Things the Carried or All Quiet on the Western Front has changed students’ opinions about war.
Unfortunately, I’ll be bereft of clickers next year. The tech people giveth and they taketh away. But my pathetic Twitter feed (more on that later) has just given me a couple of options for next year even if I don’t have the cool quasi Wii handhelds to play with.
- Poll Everywhere is a service that lets you ask poll questions and then receive answers through the web or cellphones. The superpower here is that you can use either computers or cell phones to answer. When you stick with a set of 30 respondents per poll, the service stays free. You can also get the results downloaded into a PowerPoint slide. Still, it doesn’t record the respondents unless you spring for the next upgrade up so it wouldn’t work for quizzes. There is some talk about certain schools qualifying for discounts, but that wouldn’t apply to us.
- There are a host of other free-ish poll services including PollDaddy, Freepolls, PollMonkey, SurveyMonkey, and Zoomerang. These offer various levels of support and ability depending on the service.
- I’m also interested in backchannel chat services like Chatterous or CampFire but my District bans such site like they are scurrilous plagues, so it would be hard to fall in love only to be ripped untimely from their bosoms.
Any other ideas for Clicker replacements?
See also this .pdf about 7 rules for clickers, this Wired article about the same, Clickers: A Classroom Innovation by Derek?, and then this breakdown from Vanderbilt U.
Image Credit: Flickr 21/365 New Clicker! hcobb826’s photostream
October 1st, 2008 at 4:11 pm
I’ve heard of using Google Forms as a quasi-clicker but it’s not anywhere near ideal for regular or heavy use. I’m curious, though, after reading your post and having used clickers for years and recently Poll Everywhere and a couple more formal survey tools, what is missing? Or should I say, why are you looking for alternatives? If my interpretation is accurate, it looks like you only want free alternatives. If that’s the case, do you ever really expect that there would be a ‘free’ clicker-type product or service? I think the companies that make tools and software have to sell these things and make money, don’t you?
Reading your post just sort of highlighted for me how I see lots of teachers ‘in search of something better’ when really the tools that are out there are actually pretty decent but, guess what, they cost money. So are these teachers really “looking for alternatives that might be better” or are they really just trying to get something for nothing?